As an ageing population, it is now evident that most Australians are expected to live for twenty years or more past their 65th birthday. With this comes the complexity of health problems that exist with an increasing older population residing in our communities. In 2022 99.2% of people aged 65 years and over had at least one long-term health condition. This creates a challenge for health professionals when trying to manage and support older people to live their best lives, as often the health system isn’t set up to appropriate deal with this level of complexity.
At the same time, the way we deliver health care is rapidly changing and as such there is opportunities to improve our approach to support the health and wellbeing of older people. Creating age-friendly models of care are gaining momentum across the globe. These models have a focus on working with older people to understand what matters to them through implementing evidenced-base care that has a coordinated approach.
As allied health professionals we need to ensure that we are working in partnership with our clients, while understanding the diversity of needs and wishes of older people and not having a one size fits all approach to healthcare.
This article explores age-friendly health service models of care and how allied health professionals can contribute to facilitating age-friendly health practice.
In this article I will focus on:
Allied health services are provided across a broad range of settings within Australia, including inpatient and outpatient hospital settings, community health centres and the private sector. All these settings regularly engage with older people and as such allied health practitioners have a role to play in ensuring that the services that they provide are age friendly.
Now that the Covid pandemic lockdowns are behind us, we need to keep reflecting on this question: ‘How can we reintroduce care differently, instead of just carrying on with business as usual?’
An age friendly health system is based on the 4M’s international framework that is evidence-based and is designed to prevent decline, while maintaining or improving the health and wellbeing or older people who are accessing health services.
The Institute for Healthcare Improvement describes the 4Ms as a framework or model of care that is not designed to be an addition to the care that is already being provided, but rather enables health professionals to consider whether are they incorporating all the essential areas of care to improve health outcomes for older people.
The four elements to this framework include:
Health services need to be orientated towards the needs of older people rather than on the focus of health service themselves. Within the busy-ness of the clinical day and the competing challenges of providing quality and safe healthcare balanced by financial and time pressures, it is important to remember that active listening matters.
Older people often talk about negative experiences when engaging with health professionals, such as ageism translating into sometimes insensitive or dismissive comments or management approaches. Hurried through appointments with distracted health professionals without having a chance to or feeling empowered to ask questions is also commonly highlighted. Some older people often feel that their health concerns are just dismissed or put down to old age without consideration of underlying pathology.
….he said, “I am the health professional here and I will tell you what is wrong with you” (older Australian person)
“Just a look on the health professionals’ face, you don’t want to ask questions” (Cheryl, 76 year old retired teacher)
Positive encounters can be deeply gratifying for both parties by building trust and rapport.
“The health professionals were sincerely concerned about my well-being….They behaved as if, at that very moment, I was their only patient” (Marian, 72 year old former pilot and police trainer)
“She listens; she treats me as an equal…we discuss things and she gives me choices”
While as podiatrists we aren’t always able to provide all aspects of the 4M framework, we can recognise and respond to these elements by actively engaging in conversation with our older clients and facilitating appropriate referral pathways where necessary.
Working together with older people to identify and understand their needs, expectations, values and preferences is critically important given our ageing population and the complexity of health care needs older people present with. As allied health professionals we should be responsive to the needs of our older clients and ensure that we are incorporating the spirit of an age friendly health service model into every encounter we have.
Dr Kristy Robson is a podiatry academic and research fellow at Three Rivers Department of Rural Health, Charles Sturt University. Kristy has previously taught across a range of clinical subjects in podiatry. She continues to guest lecturer to podiatry students in falls prevention and healthy ageing. Kristy has extensive experience in healthy ageing, rural workforce, and program evaluation research, particularly with a focus on enhancing mobility, independence and maintaining quality of life in older people. She is particularly interested in qualitative methodologies and community-based co-design research approaches that value participants to have an active voice and contribute to practical solutions to problems that impact their communities. Due to her expertise in ageing and rural health research she has been appointed to the NSW Ministerial Advisory Council for Ageing, supporting the Minister for Seniors to translate evidence-based research into government policy.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Health conditions prevalence. ABS. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/health-conditions-and-risks/health-conditions-prevalence/latest-release.
Tsiachristas A (2016) Financial Incentives to Stimulate Integration of Care. International Journal of Integrated Care, 16(4): 8, pp. 1–4, DOI: http://dx.doi.
org/10.5334/ijic.2532
Gonyea, J. G., & Hudson, R. B. (2015). Emerging models of age-friendly communities: A framework for understanding inclusion. Public Policy & Aging Report, 25(1), 9-14.
Mate, K. S., Berman, A., Laderman, M., Kabcenell, A., & Fulmer, T. (2018). Creating age-friendly health systems–A vision for better care of older adults. In Healthcare (Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 4-6). Elsevier.
Fulmer, T., Mate, K. S., & Berman, A. (2018). The age‐friendly health system imperative. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66(1), 22-24.
Sixsmith, J., Fang, M. L., Woolrych, R., Canham, S. L., Battersby, L., & Sixsmith, A. (2017). Ageing well in the right place: Partnership working with older people. Working with older people, 21(1), 40-48.
Mate, K., Pelton, L., Baldoza, K., Johnson, K., Duong, T., Mitchell, K., & Mather, C. (2019). Age-Friendly Health Systems: Guide to Using the 4Ms in the Care of Older Adults. Boston, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement.
Grimmer, K. (2002). Providing evidence of good allied health care for the veteran population: Development of a unique management system. Journal of Allied Health, 31(1), 15-21.
Cacchione, P. Z. (2020). Age-friendly health systems: the 4Ms framework. Clinical Nursing Research. Vol 29, Iss 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773820906667
Bridges, J., Pope, C., & Braithwaite, J. (2019). Making health care responsive to the needs of older people. Age and ageing, 48(6), 785-788.
© Copyright 2021 The Australian Podiatry Association